Investor-state dispute resolution: Will the EU-US trade deal encourage attacks on the public interest?
Date
Address
Links
Event Type
Organiser type
Section
Event Location
Event Description
In June, the EU and the US will launch negotiations for a far-reaching free trade and investment agreement, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
As part of this deal, the European Commission and the US government want to negotiate a so called investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanism. This would allow US companies investing in Europe to skirt European courts and directly challenge EU governments at international tribunals – whenever they find that laws in the area of public health, environmental, labour or social protection interfere with their profits.
EU companies investing abroad would have the same privilege in the US. Investor-state disputes can result in awards for monetary compensation reaching millions of Euros, sometimes for democratically-made laws to protect the environment, public health, labour rights and social welfare. In some cases, governments have abandoned or weakened legislation because such lawsuits were brought or threatened.
Trade unions, consumer, environmental and other public interest groups are extremely concerned about the plans to include an investor-state dispute settlement mechanism in the proposed future EU-US deal. We urge for a broad discussion and rethinking of this approach. Join us for a debate on the issue with the following speakers & inputs: Undermining democracy – why EU and US attempts to negotiate investment treaties pose a threat to the public interest (Thea Lee, Deputy Chief of Staff, US trade union federation AFL-CIO and co-chair of the Subcommittee on the Model US Bilateral Investment Treaty of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy) It’s investor-state, stupid – why EU and US investment protection reform proposals won’t be enough to protect consumers, workers and the environment (Lori Wallach, Director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch) Reactions from MEPs: Elmar Brok (EPP, tbc), Bernd Lange (S&D), Franziska Keller (Greens) Reactions from EU member state (N.N.) & the European Commission (Leopoldo Rubinacci, Head of the Investment Unit of DG Trade)
The discussion will be in English.
Related Events
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are an indispensable part of civil society. However, NGO influence on policymaking is not always positive. A large number of well-connected NGOs explicitly aim to influence EU trade and investment policymaking.
Wann: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2018
LeadershIP, the respected global convener of balanced debate and dialogue on cutting-edge IP and Antitrust policy issues, is pleased to launch the first European LeadershIP event, in Brussels on September 25.
Since the implementation of the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 the destruction of local economies and livelihoods drove many Mexicans into migration, to look for jobs and get money to send back home to their impoverished families.
ACCA, Barclays & UEAPME invite you to
Pages
Events of the week
Jobs
EURACTIV News
- French government unveils 2025 health budget
- The Brief – Cordon who? Weber’s votes leave left in limbo
- EU Global Gateway initiative, neo-colonial and pro-business according to NGOs
- Patient safety, quality care, still on back burner for most EU countries, according to new WHO data [Advocacy Lab Content]
- New ESM study shows Europe’s trade and capital flow issues go much beyond tariffs